Just Guessing

After his famous and repeated position concerning Guantanamo and its lawless, hapless detainees, one expected the new president to pursue his fair stand for justice concerning the second most illegal American detention camp outside of the USA.

Alas, as many of in other areas to come (or stuff that already happened, like the deadly use of drone in the midst of populous areas in Pakistan) the new administration only abides with the former, in as far as Bagram and its unknown number of detainees -some since 2002-, are concerned.

“Having considered the matter, the government adheres to its previously articulated position,” wrote Michael F. Hertz, acting assistant attorney general.
 

So, no trial for them. Knowing the degree of haste, panic and ignorance with which the US forces acted at first and the degree of incompetence and corruption on the part of the Afghan government, one can only wonder:
what is the proportion of wholly innocent people whose lives have been mercilessly destroyed?
Can they not expect a little of this hope and change we've been told was coming?

After all the the talk about the thorough vetting to which anyone susceptible to be part of the new administration was supposed to go through, I find discouraging to learn, like everybody, that so many guys fretted out unimpeded.
First it was Gov. Richardson, and we all thought "Okay, the guy had this thing going and Obama's staff found out a bit late about it, but not too late since the flamboyant (and very efficient diplomat) Latino politician took it on himself to step out early.

Then it was Geithner, who didn't pay his taxes when he was an IMF employee. Supposedly, the forms were so complexes the poor man got a bit confused and mixed American and International tax revenue, blablah...
Geithner, highly recommended by Rubin, the man who brought Citi to the meltdown and utter collapse, the big guru of derivatives, one of Obama's main economic advisers during the campaign.
Geithner, who finally got the job of Treasury Secretary...
Still, I thought "Okay i don't like the guy Geithner and his explanations while facing the Senatorial Comittee didn't convince me, but maybe the President knows better..

Now, it's Daschle, whom every senator seems to be so fond of, who forgot to pay about $140,000 in taxes due to the use of a car and driver lent by a friend whose company is a big donor of the Democratic party.
Daschle, who made $200,000 during the last two years (out of around a total of 2 millions in revenue) in helping health care industries make their way in Washington.
Somehow, I thought I read somewhere that the revolving door habit of coming from an administration to work for the related industry and vice-versa was prohibited by Obama?
Change, you said?
Update
Hard to say if it is a matter for laughs or tears.
The moment Daschle announces he retires from Secretary nomination because of his tax issue, we hear that Nancy Killefer, who had been appointed by president Obama to a new job consisting in scrutinizing government spending, told the administration on Monday that she would  step down from the position at the Office of Management and Budget...because of tax-related issues..
Either it means Obama doesn't know who to pick, or that his team is better than previous ones at insisting on clean records?

Obama's order to abolish the deeply unfair, narrow-minded and catastrophic ban on aid to movements, organisations or foundations that helped abortion or contraceptive measures in emerging countries is right, and puts America backwith hte rich, privileged countries already providing assistance to women.
→ more Lire la suite...